Why the Iowa Model is the Ideal Choice for Guiding Your PICOT-Based EBP Project

Choosing the right EBP model is a critical step in the initial stage of any clinical project that is aimed at enhancing the care of the patients. The various models that are available can help when deciding which one will suit the PICOT question best, and this will determine the successful outcomes of the EBP initiative. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care is one of the most popular among nursing professionals because of its clarity, applicability, versatility, and scientific evidence. In this article, we discuss why the Iowa Model could be the best model to follow and use when undertaking your EBP project.

Clarity, Organization, and Conceptual Flow in the Iowa Model

Another advantage of the Iowa Model is that it is very concise and clear in presenting the stages of EBP. Intended to be both sequential and cyclical, the model starts with problem-focused trigger or knowledge-focused trigger such as clinical issues, newly published guidelines or practice variation observed. Once a relevant problem or trigger is identified, the model guides the user through five specific steps that are: forming a team, acquiring and synthesizing data, implementing a trial run of the change, assessing the results, and implementing the practice change as a regular part of practice. This breakdown of the process into steps also helps the advanced practice nurses and clinical leaders to implement the changes based on the evidence from research without getting bogged down by theories or complicated frameworks.

One of the significant aspects that make it easier to use is that it has a diagrammatic representation of the model. It provides an easy and clear layout of the model that helps the users to understand its phases and implement them in a sequential manner. While some EBP models are highly theoretical, the Iowa Model is well balanced and can be effectively used for direct practice changes. Moreover, there is an indication of the feedback loops, which means that the healthcare providers can go back to the previous stages if the evaluation indicates that the change is inefficient or requires modification.

This structure becomes especially useful when applying the model to a PICOT question, where there must be clearly defined outcomes and timeframe. Whether your question concerns the factors that can help decrease readmissions rates of elderly patients or increase the proportion of patients with hypertension who receive necessary screening, the Iowa Model’s structure allows for a seamless translation of the inquiry process into the practical application.

Comprehensiveness, Ease of Use, and Adaptability in Clinical Settings

The other factor that makes the Iowa Model suitable for EBP initiatives is because of its applicability and versatility in all the phases of implementation. The model does not only recommend the practice change but leads clinicians through the pilot phase, to make sure that the proposed interventions are initially tried on a smaller scale before it is implemented. This phase serves to reduce risks, get staff input and to assess the viability of the broader implementation plans. After piloting, the model suggests the evaluation of the outcomes which is a step that can be in line with the last component of a well-framed PICOT question.

The Iowa Model is also easy to follow for clinicians and other healthcare personnel who may not be well conversant with research. The concepts are basic and tangible and are based on current practice, making them easy to implement especially in a multi-disciplinary team. The model is easily understandable by nurses, physicians, therapists, and administrators, and they can all participate in the implementation of the model. Thus, the Iowa Model establishes order and responsibility in how EBP projects are carried out in healthcare organizations.

Flexibility is another key advantage. The Iowa Model can be used in any clinical problem, with any type of patients and in any care delivery context. Regardless of whether you are implementing a change process to address pediatric asthma management, fall prevention in the geriatric units, or enhancing diabetes care in primary care clinics, the Iowa Model can be used. This has made the model a popular choice for many institutions that are implementing large scale quality improvement interventions or changes at the unit level of practice. In addition, it is useful at both the individual level, for bedside nurses, and at the organizational level, for nurse executives.

Evidence of High Usage and Widespread Adoption in Academic Writing

Last but not the least, the more the Iowa Model is widely adopted and used in published nursing literature, the more it is considered valid and credible for EBP projects. The model has been published and used in many refereed journals, clinical practice guidelines and nursing texts, thus making it a well established model in the nursing field. This has not only validates the usefulness of the model but also offers a pool of existing research that other researchers can either build upon or replicate in their setting.

Nurses practicing the Iowa Model have a strong academic background to support them which is comprised of case studies, implementation manuals, and scholarly studies that have been conducted on the model. Thus, this evidence base increases the level of trust of the nurse leaders and educators on the appropriateness of the framework to guide the PICOT-driven inquiries. Furthermore, the Iowa Model is also widely used in many schools of nursing and clinical residency programs due to its recognition as one of the best models of EBP in healthcare organizations.

Furthermore, healthcare organisations that seek or desire to achieve Magnet Recognition by the American Nurses Credentialing Centre (ANCC) often recommend the use of the Iowa Model as a part of their organisational framework aimed at enhancing nursing excellence. This increases the importance and credibility of the model as an instrument in enabling institutions deliver on the national benchmarks on quality, safety and patient-centeredness.

Conclusion

Consequently, the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care is suitable for developing nursing PICOT questions because of its simplicity, structure, use, and applicability to various population and contexts. It has easy to follow flowchart that aids in the logical flow of the steps to be followed and the pilot testing and evaluation mechanisms built into the program. The model is used in scholarly literature and is endorsed by healthcare organizations, which makes it not only a feasible but also an empirically supported and reputable model. For the nurses and the healthcare teams who are looking for an evidence-based practice model that is easy to use and effective in bringing about practice change that is sustainable, the Iowa Model is the best approach to use.

Related Assignment Questions

Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question
Select one of the common EBP models that you think it best fits your PICOT question and then explain/justify your selection considering the following:

• The clarity and conciseness of the model’s concepts and organization
• The diagrammatic representation of the model and the ability to assimilate the concepts and organizes the step of the desired EBP changes
• The comprehensiveness of the model from the beginning stages to implementation and evaluation of outcomes
• The easiness of the use when concepts are applied to direct EBP changes and practice issues in clinical settings
• The flexibility of the model to be applied to various populations of patients, EBP projects, initiatives, and programs
• The use and popularity of the model in the published literature
• This assignment should be no more than 2-3 pages (not including the title or references pages).
  Common EBP Models:

1. 1. The Stetler Model of Evidence-Based Practice  
   2. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to promote quality care 
   3. The Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change  
   4. The Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration (ARCC) model for implementation and sustainability of EBP  
   5. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework  
   6. The Clinical Scholar model  
   7. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model  
   8. The ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation 

Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:

Turnitin Report

Formatting

Title Page

Citation

Outline

Place an Order